I think the  server should be a famous surfing break like pipeline and the 
clients could have board names like Malibu or thruster. 



David Ford [email protected]
0410507420



On 18/09/2010, at 0:05, ThomasWrobel <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think the confusion is "wave" is used just too much.
> Its a protocol name, a product name, and a name for a thread within
> the protocol.
> One would be fine, but all 3 is just confusing.
> 
> I do like the Wave In A Box name though, and (personally) I think
> Federation is a pretty darn cool goal for anything too.
> 
> Maybe "Wave" should be kept purely for the federation name, and
> variants for the server name, but clients should be given completely
> unrelated names?
> 
> On Sep 17, 2:13 pm, Anders <[email protected]> wrote:
>> +1 The brand name Wave can include all wave service providers, be used
>> consistently in news articles etc and is easy for end users to
>> remember.
>> 
>> On Sep 17, 1:54 pm, Graham Simpson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Even simpler, people don't really think of Wave in a box as a name
>>> either, Let's just call it Wave! If that's what it is, and if Google
>>> is shutting down Google Wave and thus avoiding a branding clash - Wave
>>> will do fine as the name of the server.
>> 
>>> On Sep 17, 7:57 am, Dave butlerdi <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>> +1
>> 
>>>> On 17 September 2010 08:41, Joseph Gentle <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> I hate the proliferation of meaningless names. Its like unnecessary
>>>>> product complexity - it makes users think and learn unnecessarily.
>> 
>>>>> We have used up our quota of stupid names already anyway - "wave",
>>>>> "splash", "fedone", "wavelet", "gadget", "fedone"...
>> 
>>>>> You may see 'wave in a box' as a milestone, but I think everybody else

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to