Ah! What you suggest is coming. It's mentioned in the protocol
("known_wavelets") but the FedOne server doesn't implement it's end of the
deal yet. Yes, when you already have a snapshot you don't need another one,
you need to open a stream of deltas beginning at the version you already
know.

So we're working on that. Stay tuned!

Alex

On 29 September 2010 16:33, Sergejs <[email protected]> wrote:

> First of all, thank you for the reply!
>
> Hmm... If the snapshot is always sent, then it is not so good for me
> by at least two reasons:
>
> 1. This is slow (if other users didn't change anything, I would like
> to receive nothing).
> 2. I need to check, which part of the snapshot I already have, and
> which - not.
>
> Of course, I can accept the situation, but for me, it would be better,
> if I could specify the wave version I have locally during the connect,
> and the server would send a snapshot since that version. What I
> actually need is an additional parameter (which specifies the local
> wave version) in the BackendFactory create method.
>
> Nevertheless, thank you for the information.
>
> On Sep 29, 2:05 am, Alex North <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I believe we have already resolved this. Client can no longer specify
> that
> > they don't accept snapshots, and the server always sends them.
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/source/detail?r=1e4eb6366bab0f...
> >
> > <http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/source/detail?r=1e4eb6366bab0f..
> .>But
> > I might be missing something.
> >
> > A.
> >
> > On 29 September 2010 03:20, Sergejs <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hello!
> >
> > > I'm new to wave developing, but I'm interested in applying wave
> > > technologies in my scientific work. I tried to experiment with the
> > > console client for FedOne, and all is OK for me except one point: each
> > > time the client connects, it receives the full history of the wave (I
> > > use WaveletOperationListener interface). The question is, how the
> > > client can say to FedOne, that it already has some version of the wave
> > > and needs only updates since that version?
> >
> > > Thank you!
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "Wave Protocol" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> <wave-protocol%2bunsubscr...@goog legroups.com>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Wave Protocol" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to