Sounds like my problems, though I've heard you can try disabling TLS. But even when I do that, I get timeouts with wavesandbox.com. If somebody needs a server to test with, I can run mine for a little bit.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:24 PM, James Purser <[email protected]>wrote: > No it's not. > > When attempting to federate with the sandbox I get the following error > from my own server: > > 20/10/2010 12:22:19 PM > org.waveprotocol.box.server.waveserver.WaveServerImpl submitDelta > INFO: Sending update to client listener: > CoreWaveletDelta([email protected], > 4:92tZMTtU1/KmwzYxK4BMRNys0/s=, 1 ops: > [AddParticipant([email protected])]) > 20/10/2010 12:22:20 PM org.waveprotocol.wave.federation.xmpp.RemoteDisco$3 > retry > INFO: Sending disco items request for: wavesandbox.com, timeout 15 seconds > 20/10/2010 12:22:21 PM > org.waveprotocol.wave.federation.xmpp.RemoteDisco$3$1 error > INFO: Remote server wavesandbox.com failed on disco items: > UNDEFINED_CONDITION > 20/10/2010 12:22:21 PM > org.waveprotocol.wave.federation.xmpp.RemoteDisco requestDiscoInfo > INFO: Sending disco info request for: wavesandbox.com > 20/10/2010 12:22:21 PM > org.waveprotocol.wave.federation.xmpp.RemoteDisco requestDiscoInfo > INFO: Sending disco info request for: wave.wavesandbox.com > IDLE s...@27081530 [d=false,io=1,w=true,rb=false,wb=false] > IDLE s...@33116517 [d=false,io=1,w=true,rb=false,wb=false] > 20/10/2010 12:22:25 PM org.waveprotocol.wave.federation.xmpp.RemoteDisco > finish > INFO: Could not discover remote JID: error_code: UNDEFINED_CONDITION > for wavesandbox.com > 20/10/2010 12:22:25 PM > org.waveprotocol.box.server.waveserver.WaveServerImpl$5 onFailure > WARNING: outgoing waveletDeltaUpdate failure: error_code: > RESOURCE_CONSTRAINT > error_message: "error_code: UNDEFINED_CONDITION\n" > > 20/10/2010 12:22:25 PM > org.waveprotocol.box.server.waveserver.WaveServerImpl$6 onFailure > WARNING: outgoing waveletCommitUpdate failure: error_code: > RESOURCE_CONSTRAINT > error_message: "error_code: UNDEFINED_CONDITION\n" > > Which is better than the continual timeouts I guess :) > > James > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Vega <[email protected]> wrote: > > Question: is it currently possible to federate with wavesandbox.com or > > not? Or put it this way - does anyone is able to federate with > > wavesandbox? > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- --Matt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
