That sounds great. We look forward to your contributions - shout out if you need any help.
On 21 October 2010 03:47, pedz <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I will venture into the water. I need to set up a host and > start cobbling together all the pieces. I plan to host this on an AIX > machine so that will be interesting I'm sure. I'll look into doing a > starter project too. As usual, I have a full time job so I can't > participate too much but this seems like it (or something just like > it) will replace a lot of what we current are using. > > Thanks guys... > > On Oct 18, 5:33 pm, Joseph Gentle <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:31 AM, pedz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > I just discovered "wave" via the video of the 2009 Google I/O. It > > > looked super duper but then I discovered that it has been -- what? -- > > > abandoned? slowed down? It is a little bewildering to me why. If > > > Google is open to feedback on this matter, I'd like to speak up. The > > > wave concept(s) look very promising and exciting. I saw someone say > > > it was too complex but that seems like a rather lame reason. > > > > > But, what I want to ask if this: it appears that WIAB is "alpha" > > > stage. I *thought* I wanted to set up a wave server internal to our > > > company and try and use it for a tool to help collaboration and > > > teaming. We've tried email, forums, IRC, etc. They all have some > > > problem somehow. The "wave" concept looked very attractive for a > > > number of reasons. > > > > > My question is, should I or not? Is WIAB too immature to be used as a > > > tool? I'm a pretty good programmer but don't know Java at all -- I'm > > > a Ruby fan and my bread and butter is in C. Sounds like most (all) of > > > WIAB is in Java. The robots and those features are not my primary > > > interest. My primary interest is the idea of a "chat" (like IM) but > > > with history and state so that I can reply to someone who is not > > > online and they will see it when they log in. Also, the idea of > > > threaded chats is really interesting. These would not be "important" > > > -- so if it crashed or whatever, that would be no big deal. > > > > > Thank you for your help, > > > Perry > > > > Yeah; there's no way I want to go back to collaborating via email and > > whatnot. Sadly though, WIAB is still much too young to be used in > > production. Give us a couple months to fix things up. Its not just > > crashy (though it is that, too). Its missing features that are kind of > > important (like waves being actually saved to disk). > > > > You're welcome to give it a try & help out if you want. We'd > > definitely appreciate the help. There's a list of starter projects > > here:http://www.waveprotocol.org/code/starter-projects > > The whole thing is written in Java. Its is an easy language to pick > > up, but diving head-first into a foreign language is usually kind of > > crap. There are some good java books out there - and if you know ruby, > > you should be able to learn most of java's syntax in a couple days. > > > > If you can wait a couple months, we'll have something thats much > > better for you to play with :) > > > > -J > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
