Was this due to the inordinate number of permutations (~30)? This has now been fixed, along with enabling some compiler features for speedier compiles. compile_gwt and compile_gwt_dev should be much faster now.
On Oct 19, 7:33 pm, James Purser <[email protected]> wrote: > Oooooooh > > On another note, compile_gwt is taking forever with the latest code. > > James > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:55 PM, David Hearnden <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > We've just published the design document for the Wave-In-A-Box > > client's wave panel! > > > For Wave-In-A-Box, instead of re-using the wave panel from the Google > > Wave client, we opted to use a new design that was already underway. > > This redesign, code-named Undercurrent, came after many lessons were > > learned about what worked well and what did not work well with the > > architecture of the original wave panel. > > >http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol/design-proposals/new-wave-panel-... > > > Questions and feedback on the document are most welcome. Most of the > > design has already been implemented and checked in, and you can use > > the new wave panel right now (instructions at the end of the > > document). A few features are still missing, and will be added in the > > coming weeks. > > > Cheers, > > > -David > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Wave Protocol" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
