On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 1:23 PM, John Poole <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, I followed the instructions and simply ran "ant".
> I followed your suggestion and ran "ant dist" and, indeed, the jar
> files were built.
>
> I recommend the Instruction Page at
> http://www.waveprotocol.org/code/installation
> and the Quick Start at http://www.waveprotocol.org/code
> be modified to state "ant dist" instead of "ant", or the build.xml be
> modified to target "dist" in general.
>

The default target being run when "ant" is called is dist and it is actually
calling compile_gwt now as well since [0]. So I'm not sure what happened.

Greetings,
Lennard

[0]
http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/source/detail?r=a8c64c159503861288e8439994f333b876d54f2b


>
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Lennard de Rijk <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Did you run just "ant"? That should actually build the server jar for you
> in
> > the dist/ folder. In any case running "ant dist" should also do the
> trick.
> > Let me know if this helps you.
> > Greetings,
> > Lennard
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 6:35 AM, John Poole <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I should have indicated what version:
> >>     hermes wave-protocol # hg status
> >>     ? output_ant_compile_gwt.txt
> >>     hermes wave-protocol # hg summary
> >>     parent: 598:ddec70308b80 tip
> >>      Removed commented line.
> >>     branch: default
> >>     commit: 1 unknown (clean)
> >>     update: (current)
> >>     hermes wave-protocol #
> >>
> >>
> >> On Oct 30, 6:22 am, John Poole <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Following the Quick Start instructions
> >> > athttp://www.waveprotocol.org/code
> >> >
> >> >      hermes wave-protocol # ./run-server.sh
> >> >      Unable to access jarfile dist/waveinabox-server-0.3.jar
> >> >      hermes wave-protocol #
> >> >
> >> > My build was successful and without messages to standard error.
> >> > Here's the an build record:
> >> >
> >> >      hermes wave-protocol # cat output_ant_compile_gwt.txt
> >> >      Buildfile: /var/work/wave/wave-protocol/build.xml
> >> >
> >> >      init:
> >> >
> >> >      proto_compile:
> >> >          [javac] /var/work/wave/wave-protocol/build.xml:69: warning:
> >> > 'includeantruntime'           was not set, defaulting to
> >> > build.sysclasspath=last; set to           false for repeatable builds
> >> >
> >> >      gen_gxp:
> >> >
> >> >      compile:
> >> >          [javac] Compiling 7 source files to
> >> > /var/work/wave/wave-protocol/build/core
> >> >           [copy] Copying 19 files to
> >> > /var/work/wave/wave-protocol/build/core
> >> >
> >> >      proto_gwt_compile:
> >> >          [javac] /var/work/wave/wave-protocol/build.xml:222: warning:
> >> > 'includeantruntime'      was not set, defaulting to
> >> > build.sysclasspath=last; set to false      for repeatable builds
> >> >          [javac] Compiling 4 source files to
> >> > /var/work/wave/wave-protocol/build/core
> >> >
> >> >      compile_gwt:
> >> >           [java] Compiling module
> >> > org.waveprotocol.box.webclient.WebClientProd
> >> >           [java]    Compiling 6 permutations
> >> >           [java]       Compiling permutation 0...
> >> >           [java]       Compiling permutation 1...
> >> >           [java]       Compiling permutation 2...
> >> >           [java]       Compiling permutation 3...
> >> >           [java]       Compiling permutation 4...
> >> >           [java]       Compiling permutation 5...
> >> >           [java]    Compile of permutations succeeded
> >> >           [java] Linking into
> /var/work/wave/wave-protocol/war/webclient
> >> >           [java]    Link succeeded
> >> >           [java]    Compilation succeeded -- 163.639s
> >> >
> >> >      BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> >> >      Total time: 2 minutes 48 seconds
> >> >      hermes wave-protocol #
> >> >
> >> > Question:  Should I be posting problems such as these on this list, or
> >> > would be it be better to place them in a some sort of
> >> > ticket/problem/bug?  The home page athttp://www.waveprotocol.org/Home
> >> > does not disclose where problems should be directed to and I hate to
> >> > clutter this list with what may be distractions.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > John L. Poole
> >> >
> >> > P.O. Box 6566
> >> > Napa, CA 94581-6566
> >> > 707-812-1323
> >> >
> >> > [email protected]
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "Wave Protocol" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
> >>
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Wave Protocol" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> John L. Poole
>
> P.O. Box 6566
> Napa, CA 94581-6566
> 707-812-1323
>
> [email protected]
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Wave Protocol" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to