If you need transactions and to rey several data stores you might wish to look at Blueprints at Tinkerpops. This provides generic support for many data stores. OrientDB has TX as do a few others included.
http://www.tinkerpop.com/post/380560703/blueprints-a-property-graph-model-interface On 3 November 2010 16:43, Lennard de Rijk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:11 AM, x00 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What is wrong with the word 'use'? It is like no one every *uses* it >> any more. Everyone 'utili(s|z)es', whatever that means. At a push >> 'make use of'. Truthiness? >> >> Is there are reason for wanting to use mySQL? >> >> I think the reason why WIAB uses MongoDB as the application suits >> NoSQL approach, and the scalability lends it self to and uncertain >> future. >> >> > I believe transactionality is easier to achieve in MySQL in complex setups. > Yes we are writing a MongoDB implementation but I don't see any reason why > someone can't contribute a MySQL one :). > > Greetings, > Lennard > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > -- Regards Dave Butler -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
