Nice idea. I have no objection. 2010/12/1 Michael MacFadden <[email protected]>
> All, > > I think at least we came to an agreement that the wave protocol and > the Wave in a Box project will be treated separately (even if they are > hosted in the same project to reduce complexity for the time being). > > Given that, I was thinking that we should start organizing > waveprotocol.org such that there is a section dedicated to the > protocols and a section dedicated to Wave in a Box. At the moment > they are all intertwined. We have proposals, design documents, > roadmaps, etc for both the protocol and for the WiaB implementation. > > I think structuring this would be beneficial and help interested > parties get to the right spot. Are there any objections? > > Michael > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
