This is a preposal for searching in waves for specific text strings and displaying the results as a wave right? It seems fine for that angle.
What about searching for a wave itself ? Has consideration been put into that in some way, so waves can be labeled for topics, then people can search for specific labels or combinations of labels. (presumably with those waves labeled the same by most people being considered stronger/more trustworthy). As far as public waves go, I think the initial "search" before a user subscribes is a problem in itself. On Dec 6, 11:44 pm, Alex North <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all, > > A few months ago Joseph and I worked on a design for using a wave as the > communication transport for search results, including your inbox. We then > decided that while this mechanism is good and wavey, Wave in a Box would be > better served by first taking advantage of the search Data API to get basic > inbox and search functionality without adding so much code. > > I'm publishing the design now just because it's come up in a few > conversations. I don't think we should implement it (or something like it) > yet, but perhaps some time next year after basic WIAB is up and functional. > > https://sites.google.com/a/waveprotocol.org/wave-protocol/protocol/de... > > A. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
