I don't dislike the idea, just not sure it's the best way to do those particular cases. Spelling and language annotators require huge resources, so of course need to be run on servers. Given that, it's probably simpler to just make the annotations from the server. That would certainly be lighter on the bandwidth and probably provide lower latency responses overall.
On 9 December 2010 09:55, x00 <[email protected]> wrote: > I wasn't talking about caja itself just the doodad. > > I meant providing similar functionality as spellie or rosie. Querying > a external resource. I presume you don't like that idea. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
