(Bringing this over to the wave-dev list on apache) Hi Kyngar,
Actually what is missing for MongoDB or SQL perisistance is someone to pick them up and run with them. While the file based persistance is probably the lowest hanging fruit delta persistance wise, there is nothing stopping anyone from contributing code which allows people to use MongoDB or any other data storage method. If you want to pick it up, then I would love to see it, and I think if you can show a good design or code chunk then I think you'll find people are perfectly willing to help out. James On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Ya Knygar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > So, there is no planning for future MongoDB support? > As i see for now - there is no activity on SQL persistence topic also > > As i think - for stable future of WIAB > - there should be support for > mature - yet easy to config - > > SQL DB(i suggest PostgreSQL for start) with really stable search > platform (i think - Apache Solr) > working in most cases, and I cant see - why to build-invent > own-verycustom WIAB search-DB solution, with bugs, not working > with most easy to start-on hosting companyes.. > if there are many 'standart' solutions for projects with such scale? > > Building with SQL+popular search platform - WIAB could achieve > reputation of > nice - easy scallable opensource product, that one could build in > almost every existing server-structure > without reconfiguring whole site-system > rather than becoming > - small pro-community driven - read tons of tutorials - rewrite by > yourself - ask in group - structure.. > If there at last - a chance to fully bring WIAB to masses in many > countries and so, > why to nigilate it with so many hard to implement-here solutions? > > I'm sorry for such emotional post, but i know for sure - MANY > people all over the world - love the Wave idea, waited for stable > federation release to start building cool - > trans-community social networks, when you personally can - change - > reconfig -restyle what you want for your > site-forum community, and still - have a chance to easy invite other > site's community to yours without openid's > fb's or other - not so cool options, > wave federation - seemed like beautiful semantic web platform for > such a small revolution , you know. > > And with approach like i see - now - if there will be package-suitable > option for simple installation - integration > into existing site platforms - for not so tech savvy people, > it will be in best case - in half a year or so - simply - by > negotiating relatively simple opensource java(i still think Python is > better for > fast groving - many commiters comunity) > approach by hard to deal with Search-DB solutions > > Am i wrong? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
