Thanks On Jan 12, 5:57 pm, Alex North <[email protected]> wrote: > Logging deltas and trying to understand what's happening to the underlying > data should definitely help you. > > I had a brief look at your patches. I don't really understand the second > one. In the first one, I can see that the maps member never has anything put > in it. I suggest writing a suite of unit tests to ensure your code does the > right thing before trying to figure out why it's not working across multiple > clients. Tests will also help document what you're trying to achieve for > other readers. > > On 6 January 2011 07:37, cearl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ok, the patches for the files involved were posted as issues > > 472001<http://codereview.waveprotocol.org/472001/show> > > - 474001 <http://codereview.waveprotocol.org/474001/show>. I apologize > > for not realizing that they all should have been submitted as the same patch > > set. I see that this group is now deprecated... > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Wave Protocol" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<wave-protocol%2bunsubscr...@goog > > legroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
