https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85573

--- Comment #3 from Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Bastien Nocera from comment #2)
> That's quite a flippant approach. If you couldn't depend the caller behaving
> properly, you'd get crashes anyway. And valgrind would tell you where the
> problem is without a doubt.

Yeah, but you'd see the crash in libinput first, then have to debug/valgrind to
find out it's in the caller. all of which wastes human resources.

> What devices wouldn't have udev handles, and what devices wouldn't have a
> device node?

some virtualised/emulated devices may not have a normal node, e.g.
keysym-producing keyboards.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
wayland-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-bugs

Reply via email to