https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84817
--- Comment #13 from Daniel Stone <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Paranoik from comment #12)
> The only thing
> needed to rethink were: keyboard and mouse events should only be passed to
> active window, clipboard content should only be seen to a program after user
> decides to paste its content into the window and of course user level
> applications shouldn't be able to capture the screen or other application
> windows client area and create mouse and keyboard events themselves.
All these things are true of Wayland, and have been since day one.
> After
> that every program running from any user profile can be allowed to access
> the desktop because no program would be able to steal info from the other
> program through the desktop or manipulate the other program through its
> graphical interface. This can absolutely be implemented during the
> development of a new API. We were told that wayland is a new modern desktop
> environment made by xorg developers who learned on previous errors. But what
> we actually see is the same level of security we had before but now programs
> are banned from appearing on the desktop. No programs no problems. Heh. Its
> like a joke about a doctor who cured disease by cutting a patient head off.
> This could be somehow achieved on a previous xorg interface there is no need
> in new API to ban programs, this is not a new level of security we needed.
This is unproductive. There is no 'ban' of anything: if you want the socket to
be more widely accessible, then you can make it more widely accessible. It's
not difficult.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
wayland-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-bugs
