Ah, ok, it's good to hear something remotely (no pun intended) similar is in the works. And I don't predict lion taking over by any means, just being the best for a little while, even if expensive, and that windows hasn't been feature competitive with Linux in at least a couple of years in my opinion.
Sincerely, Josh On Mar 16, 2011, at 11:54 PM, Marty Jack <[email protected]> wrote: > Mostly, it is identically equal to "remote Wayland protocol". Except that > this iSwifter thing is specific to remoting Flash applications. > > Speaking of which there is a GSOC'11 proposal over on X.org to do the remote > Wayland protocol. > > The parts about Lion taking over the world I am skeptical of seeing that to > my knowledge Lion is only going to run on hardware supplied by Apple, which > is a tiny fraction of all hardware. > > But, don't let me dissuade anyone, it is open source and people should feel > free to work on anything they think is valuable. > > On 03/16/2011 10:53 PM, Corbin Simpson wrote: >> Um. >> >> This sounds overly grandiose and not really Wayland-specific. Also, most >> people don't have lots of iron sitting in their garages. I think you may >> have upgraded "Wouldn't it be cool if...?" to "Dude, this is a killer >> feature!" >> >> Sending from a mobile, pardon the brevity. ~ C. >> >> On Mar 16, 2011 7:11 PM, "Josh Leverette" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> wayland-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel > _______________________________________________ > wayland-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
