* Kristian Høgsberg <[email protected]> schrieb: > The plan I have here, and you probably saw that in the TODO, is > to just let the client manage the entire 32 bit namespace and > have a'bind' request:
Good idea. At this point you can also give the global objects really names (eg. pathnames). A bind request would be something like an open() ... A few more such steps and we're at 9P ... > I suppose we need an unbind to match bind. Client created objects > will always have a "destroy" request. Do we really need an explicit destroy ? Why not just an close() ? (gc/refcount will take care of the rest). cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: [email protected] mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
