On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 21:20 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On 23/02/12 19:57 , Tiago Vignatti wrote: > > On 02/23/2012 07:58 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > >> Includes rudimentary styling only. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer<peter.hutte...@who-t.net> > >> --- > >> A few things to note: > >> - I'm not a designer > >> - Having a html version of the protocol makes it a lot easier to read, > >> and > >> it certainly reveals missing bits of documentation in the protocol > >> - the .css file is the one from wayland.freedesktop.org, someone could > >> easily fix it to prettify the result a bit. > > > > I concur we need a prettier way to read the protocol. But what do you > > think about the idea of dumping the whole protocol in a separate section > > of main.tex instead? > > largely depends on what you expect the canonical source to be. shouldn't > be that hard to knock up another xslt that converts the xml into latex.
I would prefer HTML over Latex. Especially if the resulting HTML is hosted as some form of online documentation. regards, Michael _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
