On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Bill Spitzak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > if you run weston without --xserver, it will never load xwayland.so, >> and therefore there will never be the special X window manager, that >> will map X window events into Wayland protocol. Therefore you will >> never get an X window mapped in Weston. >> >> The special X window manager is implemented in xwayland.so, and for >> now, it runs in the same process as Weston. >> > > Is this the intended final design, or will this function be moved to > xserver? It sure seems like it would fit into xserver better. It sounds to > me like the X window events are being somehow encapsulated into the wayland > protocol, so the wayland process can read them and translate them to real > wayland events. Wouldn't this fit much better into the xserver? No, it will likely become a client. > > > Just FYI, that it is intentional to not see any X windows when run like >> that. Crashes are a different matter. >> > > Yes the windows do not show up, and the applications appear to work as > though they are waiting for the map event. > > Then xwayland.so is running however I get a crash in the interpretation of > window events. > xwayland seems to work fine for everyone else. Try to get a real bt with debugging symbols.
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
