On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:07:51 +0200 Piotr Rak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > 2012/9/25 Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]>: > > Hi Piotr, > > > > it sounds like you make a fundamental assumption on something, that > > makes global shortcuts insecure, and so you set out to solve these > > problems. > > > > What is it that you assume? > > What is the root of the problems? > > What are the problems you are trying to solve? > > > > I should have state this more clearly, but the problem is - how to do > global shortcuts in application in secure way. The issue was raised > during XDC. Video of talk can be watched online > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJpiJii44oo&feature=relmfu - discussion > about wayland input handling starts around 23:30s. > > Those are my thoughts/comments after watching it, on one questions > that was left open there. > > > Sorry, but I just couldn't understand anything you wrote. > > Hope that explaination is sufficient. Ok, thank you for the pointer. :-) I'll listen that through when I find a suitable time. My first thought would of course be to define protocol extensions on case-by-case basis: mixer controls, playback controls, etc, and allow only one client to subscribe to an interface at a time, per seat. Anything outside of those would be server configuration for misc hotkeys. But I guess these were already raised in the talks, so I really better listen to those first. Thanks, pq _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
