On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:51:54 -0800 Bill Spitzak <spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This sounds like the problem I had in that it is finding the xorg.conf > setup needed to run X normally. What in his X log suggests that it is getting a bad xorg.conf? I did not notice any such indication. Also modulepath seems to be correct, and it is loading his custom-built nouveau_drv.so, too, as intended. It would be very nice to know what to look for. Thanks, pq > I posted a patch some time ago to make the xorg server use different > filenames when running the wayland backend. I really can't see any other > way to allow xwayland to run on the same machine that somebody may also > want to run normal X on. > > Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > The X server must not use the modules nv, vesa, or fbdev, since they > > are not Wayland-enabled drivers. Having them fail is ok and intentional. > > Something else is the problem. > > > > The only other compatible Wayland-enabled driver with a nvidia card is > > the xf86-video-wlshm, which does not depend on any particular hardware. _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
