On terça-feira, 26 de março de 2013 19.32.54, Bernhard Friedreich wrote: > What I've been wondering lately (and also in the light of recent events) is > if there is a specific reason why there's no CI (Jenkins?) and/or > reviewboard system (Gerrit?). Is it because reviewing patches on the > maillinglist gathers more feedback (out of previous experiences) or just > because it is more comfortable for you? Is it more comfortable? I guess > some system like gerrit scales better.. Or is it because no one set up > something yet? > > Has there been thought about setting up a code quality system? For example > "sonar" is very good at those things and is widely used - at least in the > java world. Didn't try it with C/C++ yet..
This is really up to the people doing reviews. They have to choose a method that is most comfortable to them. In this aspect, "convenience for the casual drive-by-submitter" is completely trumped by "convenience for the reviewer". I can't make that decision. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
