Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> writes: > were you aware of […] perhaps? :-)
Ah, no, I hadn't noticed those patches. Oops! > Your series is almost identical to Quanxian's, except: > - wording differences, of course > - patch 2 checks if output->name is set before sending (can it ever be > NULL?) > - patch 2 missed setting the actual protocol object version > - you add support to weston-info in patch 3 > - Quanxian adds empty handlers to window.c and desktop-shell.c which > isn't really necessary Ok, it sounds like it would make the most sense to use Quanxian's patches without the empty handlers and then land my weston-info patch on top. Regards, - Neil _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
