On 09/07/2014 11:28 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:

I think it is safe to assume the contents of argv will not get overwritten.

It is common to copy argv itself and modify that, but not to modify the
strings it points at.

This would be feasible only if we can guarantee that no-one will ever
need to store a dynamically allocated string to any of the assigned
variables. If something produces a dynamically allocated string, then
you would need to track if you can free() the string or not.

Or you can just leak that dynamically allocated value, which is what I would do.

Trying to shut up valgrind on exit is an exercise in futility and adding a free() to try to shut it up often requires lots of unwanted code changes as this demonstrates.

Any way it is not a big deal and any real system will probably be based on string objects of some sort. It sounds like you should also change the parse_options to copy all the string arguments too.
_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel

Reply via email to