On Monday 01 June 2015 09:26:56 Peter Hutterer wrote: > I would venture that going to proper MIT wording counts as relicensing > because the two texts are not functionally equivalent: the "don't use my > name for advertising" is clearly missing. > > AFAICT, the X11 license is functionally equivalent though: > http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:X11
Same with the 3-clause BSD license which is less "exotic". > but given that this is a significant rewording of the license text (even if > the functionality stays the same) we're basically down to: is this a license > change? and I'll have to shrug as well here and defer to the lawyers. I could ask a FSFE lawyer friend of mine. _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
