On 6 April 2016 at 14:12, Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote: > > Just a fly by shed color thought. If we in the future want to add more > > generic debug tools (for example something like xev that is a bit more > > nice than "WAYLAND_DEBUG=1 weston-terminal |& grep -e '[insert complex > > expression here]'") then maybe "wayland-tools" or "wayland-utils"? > > Then again "wayland-info" is nice because it sounds more like a > > "read-only" thing than "-tools" and "-utils". > > +1 for something like that - and the tool you're thinking of (though > incredibly unpolished) is weston-eventdemo. ;) >
Oh right, nice... <joke> ... let's rename it "wev" :-) </joke> I'm sure polishing can come later, but I dunno how bundled weston-eventdemo is with weston code though, i.e. how hard it would be to make that a standalone tool. Seems for the most part, weston code is used for the parsing of options. I'd prefer they weren't split into one repo per tool. I think, and > this is pretty much the general consensus of upstream and distributors > both, that we went too far with unbundling during Xorg modularisation. > It doesn't give anyone any practical benefit, and just makes life a > bit more difficult. > Cheers, Olivier
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
