On Thu, 26 May 2016 13:52:58 +0100 adlo <adloco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 24 May 2016, at 16:06, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The "private to weston" also means it should be a privileged interface: > > arbitrary clients must not be able to use it, as it's none of their > > concern and could be a security concern. > > > > What about Wayland Security Modules (libwsm)? In what ways does this > not solve the security issues of privileged interfaces?
I am only saying you have to pay attention to security there too. What you will use to implement it is up to each compositor on its own. Thanks, pq
pgpMWUNzvYTnt.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
