On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:31:42 +0100 Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7 July 2016 at 19:18, Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+wayl...@sardemff7.net> > wrote: > > On 07/07/2016 18:28, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> > >> On 7 July 2016 at 10:20, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> [snip] > >>> Therefore a NAK from me too. > >>> > >> As you guys wish. In that case can we drop the pkgincludedir variable > >> ? Most packages don't bother with it (on my local setup only 7 out of > >> 740 do) > > > > > > Is there a strong reason to remove it? Right now I would see it as a noise > > commit with no real value. > > > If 100 to 1 ratio isn't enough, I don't think anything is. Then again, > I'm wondering if the topic hasn't turned into a perfect bikeshedding > example ? Hi Emil, if you really care about that one variable so much to write a patch for it, I shall merge it. I believe nothing should be asking the .pc about a pkgincludedir specifically, right? Thanks, pq
pgpmghQTj5wLv.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
