On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 09:26:07AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:16:32 +0000 > Daniel Stone <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On 24 November 2017 at 11:59, Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:45:48 +0200 > > > Alexandros Frantzis <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> 2. Should we introduce similar timestamp events for keyboard and > > >> pointer? > > > > > > No, unless someone actually has a use for them. That brings the > > > question, why are you only interested in touch timestamps and not > > > keyboard and pointer? > > > > > > Why are keyboard and pointer latency not interesting to you? > > > > I would very much suggest doing so, yeah. Having timestamps for > > high-frequency/resolution mice seems like a real need. Given the need > > to correllate the event streams (e.g. 'is someone holding down Ctrl > > whilst I scroll?'), it makes it easier for clients if we have > > comparable timestamps between the two. > > Right, let's have them for all the timestamped core input events, not > only touch. > > > Thanks, > pq
Hi, thank you all for your thoughts and suggestions. I have pushed a new RFC for a separate protocol providing this functionality: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2017-November/035980.html Thanks, Alexandros _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
