On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:00:08 +0000 Daniel Stone <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Pekka, > > On 12 December 2017 at 10:44, Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:00:23 +0100 > > José Bollo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> While working for AGL [1], I want to allow applications to receive > >> the buffers allocated by WESTON. The use of the surfaces/buffers > >> allocated by Weston is difficult when Smack is activated. > > > > why do you need to make Weston allocate buffers? Why should those > > buffers be accounted to Weston rather than a client that needs them? > > > > E.g. Weston's screenshooting currently has the client allocate > > buffers, pass them to Weston, and Weston writes into them, then > > sends an event to say they are done. > > I assume this is related to the never-upstreamed ivi_share protocol > extension. > > Cheers, > Daniel Hi Daniel, Yes the probability is near 100% So it could be a design feature issue. I'm not very aware of this part of the system. Can some one explain me that share protocol, why it is needed and why it never-upstreamed? Best regards Jose _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
