On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:41:52 +0000 Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12 December 2017 at 08:28, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:16:47 +0200 > > Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 31 May 2017 22:17:50 +0100 > >> Sergei Trofimovich <sly...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> > >> > This change slightly updates c4d7f66c12853b9575366dd9f4a7960ec5694934 > >> > which added <sys/sysmacros.h> inclusion. > >> > > >> > Autoconf has AC_HEADER_MAJOR to find out which header defines > >> > reqiured macros: > >> > > >> > https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.69/html_node/Particular-Headers.html > >> > > >> > This change should increase portability across other libcs. > >> > > >> > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/610652 > >> > Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <sly...@gentoo.org> > >> > --- > >> > Change since v1: > >> > - rebased on top of current master > >> > - dedented nested '# include' > >> > configure.ac | 1 + > >> > libweston/launcher-direct.c | 9 ++++++++- > >> > libweston/launcher-logind.c | 9 ++++++++- > >> > libweston/launcher-weston-launch.c | 8 +++++++- > >> > libweston/weston-launch.c | 9 ++++++++- > >> > 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm on Gentoo with sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r9:2.2 and I am now getting a > >> bunch of warnings like this: > >> > >> /home/pq/git/weston/libweston/weston-launch.c: In function ‘handle_open’: > >> /home/pq/git/weston/libweston/weston-launch.c:333:13: warning: In the GNU > >> C Library, "major" is defined > >> by <sys/sysmacros.h>. For historical compatibility, it is > >> currently defined by <sys/types.h> as well, but we plan to > >> remove this soon. To use "major", include <sys/sysmacros.h> > >> directly. If you did not intend to use a system-defined macro > >> "major", you should undefine it after including <sys/types.h>. > >> if (major(s.st_rdev) != INPUT_MAJOR && > >> > >> > >> Reverting this patch makes the warnings go away. > >> > >> What's the right fix here? > >> > >> In config.h I have: > >> > >> /* Define to 1 if `major', `minor', and `makedev' are declared in > >> <mkdev.h>. > >> */ > >> /* #undef MAJOR_IN_MKDEV */ > >> > >> /* Define to 1 if `major', `minor', and `makedev' are declared in > >> <sysmacros.h>. */ > >> /* #undef MAJOR_IN_SYSMACROS */ > >> > >> I'm not sure what I needed to do get even that far, maybe wipe my > >> out-of-tree build dir. Even then, I cannot find any evidence of > >> configure actually running the tests. I always start a new build dir by > >> running autogen.sh. > > > > Hi, > > > > there is an email thread of the problem from a slightly different point > > of view: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2016-09/msg00000.html > > > > If we keep the code as is, the warning will not go away until glibc > > actually drops the things from sys/types.h and distros ship it. > > Apparently there is a workaround one could make with config.site: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2016-09/msg00013.html > > > > Or we could wait for a new autoconf release and require it, but the > > discussion happened in 2016 and at least Gentoo does not have a > > autoconf 2.70 yet. Or we could ship a fixed AC_HEADER_MAJOR. > > > > Or we could just revert this patch until something in the above changes > > or we have migrated to Meson. > > > I wish the glibc people were a bit more diligent about the deprecation :-( > Haven't looked at how Meson does it, but I would suspect it has a > workaround similar to this [1]. > > -Emil > [1] > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/commit/?id=7040fea0280bad527ed4b3d5eee7d7bfbf303efc Hi Emil, the workaround taken in libdrm was discussed in that 2016 email thread, concluding it is not a good idea, because autoconf compiler tests have horrible code quality: they often provoke warnings anyway, which means -Werror would cause false negatives in tests. Maybe it's fine for AC_HEADER_MAJOR alone? Thanks, pq
pgp5OumVv1n9V.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel