On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 08:40:52 -0400 Drew DeVault <s...@cmpwn.com> wrote:
> On 2018-04-16 10:53 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > That's very clear, but is it precisely your intention? Would it make > > more sense to define that the name does not change during the lifetime > > of the wl_output global instead? That would guarantee that the name > > will stay the same for the same wl_output global even if one creates > > new xdg_output objects or even restarts the application or starts > > another application. > > > > Or do you think that's already implied by the previous paragraph? > > > > Would there be any harm in using the lifetime of the wl_output global > > in the wording? I think it would be more clear than the current wording. > > I have updated it to the following: > > + The name event is sent after creating an xdg_output (see > + xdg_output_manager.get_xdg_output). This event is only sent once per > + xdg_output, and the name does not change over the lifetime of the > + wl_output. > > Will wait a while for a little more feedback to come in and then will > send off a new patch. Hi Drew, should it be "wl_output global", to differentiate from "wl_output object" (wl_proxy)? Thanks, pq
pgpK95vwCiDN_.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
