On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 05:25:26PM -0400, ferreiradaselva wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> I see your point that there would still need to exist vendor-specific
> code. My point is that reading that vendor-specific data would be
> responsibility of the end-user (the people making a wayland client),
> instead of """polluting""" the protocol with vendor-specific details. But,
> if this was the case before, and then switched later, then there must be
> something I'm not seeing.
it was in an earlier, pre-release version, while it was still under
discussion. Look for the thread with the subject
"[PATCH wayland-protocols] Add the tablet protocol" on 6 Nov 2014. That
still had an enum in it. Removed in
"[PATCH v3 wayland-protocols] Add the tablet protocol" from 29 Jan 2016.
wayland-devel mailing list