On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 05:25:26PM -0400, ferreiradaselva wrote: > Hi Peter, > > I see your point that there would still need to exist vendor-specific > code. My point is that reading that vendor-specific data would be > responsibility of the end-user (the people making a wayland client), > instead of """polluting""" the protocol with vendor-specific details. But, > if this was the case before, and then switched later, then there must be > something I'm not seeing.
it was in an earlier, pre-release version, while it was still under discussion. Look for the thread with the subject "[PATCH wayland-protocols] Add the tablet protocol" on 6 Nov 2014. That still had an enum in it. Removed in "[PATCH v3 wayland-protocols] Add the tablet protocol" from 29 Jan 2016. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
