On 2 July 2018 at 10:41, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 July 2018 at 03:07, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:02:19AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 11 June 2018 at 10:25, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 09:29:49 +1000 >>> > Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> wrote: >>> >> +PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBDRM, [libdrm >= 2.4.68], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([ >>> >> libdrm is a hard build-time dependency for libweston core, >>> >> but a sufficient version was not found. However, libdrm >>> >> is not a runtime dependency unless you have features >>> > >>> > this patch is correct, but I would like to hear more opinions if we >>> > want to bump the hard build-time dependency from release of Jan 2012 to >>> > Apr 2016. >>> > >>> > If we do this bump, we could remove the fallback definitions for >>> > DRM_FORMAT_R8 and DRM_FORMAT_GR88. >>> > >>> > In case we want to consider bumping even further, DRM_FORMAT_MOD_* were >>> > introduced in 2.4.83 (Aug 2017), and atomic in 2.4.78 (Apr 2017). >>> >>> I'd be in favour of bumping all the way to .83. It's available in >>> Debian testing and unstable, as well as for stable (stretch) via the >>> backports.debian.org repository. It's available for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS >>> via the xenial-updates repository, and releases since. It's available >>> in Yocto Rocko (Oct 2017), but unsurprisingly not in Pyro (May 2017); >>> I believe there are a few BSPs based on Pyro and earlier still, but >>> they would be pretty trivial bumps to include if vendors want to >>> upgrade Weston. >>> >>> Either patch is: >>> Acked-by: Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com> >> >> pekka: gentle ping, if you're happy with this one >> > On Debian front: > - oldstable: 2.4.74 in backports > - stable: 2.4.74 in main, 2.4.91 in backports > > Ubuntu: > - 16.04: 2.4.83 in xenial-updates > - 14.04: 2.4.67 in trusty-updates > > In other words, Trusty is def. out of the question: I'd go with this > patch for now to unblock. > Might want to bump to .83 closer to the release/branch point. > Should have added: As-is patch is Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com>
-Emil _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel