This new function allows listeners to remove themselves or any
other listener when called. This version only works if listeners
are properly removed before they are free'd.

wl_signal_emit tries to be safe but it fails: it works fine if a
handler removes its own listener, but not if it removes another
one.

It's not possible to patch wl_signal_emit directly as attempted
in [1] because some projects using libwayland directly free
destroy listeners without removing them from the list. Using this
new strategy fails in this case, causing read-after-free errors.

[1]: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/204641/

Signed-off-by: Simon Ser <cont...@emersion.fr>
---

Addressed Markus' comments [1].

[1]: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2018-July/039042.html

 src/wayland-server-core.h |  3 ++
 src/wayland-server.c      | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/signal-test.c       | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 139 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/wayland-server-core.h b/src/wayland-server-core.h
index 2e725d9..4a2948a 100644
--- a/src/wayland-server-core.h
+++ b/src/wayland-server-core.h
@@ -468,6 +468,9 @@ wl_signal_emit(struct wl_signal *signal, void *data)
                l->notify(l, data);
 }
 
+void
+wl_signal_emit_safe(struct wl_signal *signal, void *data);
+
 typedef void (*wl_resource_destroy_func_t)(struct wl_resource *resource);
 
 /*
diff --git a/src/wayland-server.c b/src/wayland-server.c
index eae8d2e..3d851f4 100644
--- a/src/wayland-server.c
+++ b/src/wayland-server.c
@@ -1932,6 +1932,56 @@ wl_client_for_each_resource(struct wl_client *client,
        wl_map_for_each(&client->objects, resource_iterator_helper, &context);
 }
 
+static void
+handle_noop(struct wl_listener *listener, void *data) {
+       /* Do nothing */
+}
+
+/** Emits this signal, safe against removal of any listener.
+ *
+ * wl_signal_emit tries to be safe but it fails: it works fine if a handler
+ * removes its own listener, but not if it removes another one.
+ *
+ * \note This function can only be used if listeners are properly removed 
before
+ *       being free'd.
+ *
+ * \param signal The signal object that will emit the signal
+ * \param data The data that will be emitted with the signal
+ *
+ * \sa wl_signal_emit()
+ *
+ * \memberof wl_signal
+ */
+WL_EXPORT void
+wl_signal_emit_safe(struct wl_signal *signal, void *data) {
+       struct wl_listener cursor;
+       struct wl_listener end;
+
+       /* Add two special markers: one cursor and one end marker. This way, we 
know
+        * that we've already called listeners on the left of the cursor and 
that we
+        * don't want to call listeners on the right of the end marker. The 'it'
+        * function can remove any element it wants from the list without 
troubles.
+        * wl_list_for_each_safe tries to be safe but it fails: it works fine
+        * if the current item is removed, but not if the next one is. */
+       wl_list_insert(&signal->listener_list, &cursor.link);
+       cursor.notify = handle_noop;
+       wl_list_insert(signal->listener_list.prev, &end.link);
+       end.notify = handle_noop;
+
+       while (cursor.link.next != &end.link) {
+               struct wl_list *pos = cursor.link.next;
+               struct wl_listener *l = wl_container_of(pos, l, link);
+
+               wl_list_remove(&cursor.link);
+               wl_list_insert(pos, &cursor.link);
+
+               l->notify(l, data);
+       }
+
+       wl_list_remove(&cursor.link);
+       wl_list_remove(&end.link);
+}
+
 /** \cond INTERNAL */
 
 /** Initialize a wl_priv_signal object
diff --git a/tests/signal-test.c b/tests/signal-test.c
index 7bbaa9f..dc762a4 100644
--- a/tests/signal-test.c
+++ b/tests/signal-test.c
@@ -115,3 +115,89 @@ TEST(signal_emit_to_more_listeners)
 
        assert(3 * counter == count);
 }
+
+struct signal
+{
+       struct wl_signal signal;
+       struct wl_listener l1, l2, l3;
+       int count;
+       struct wl_listener *current;
+};
+
+static void notify_remove(struct wl_listener *l, void *data)
+{
+       struct signal *sig = data;
+       wl_list_remove(&sig->current->link);
+       wl_list_init(&sig->current->link);
+       sig->count++;
+}
+
+#define INIT \
+       wl_signal_init(&signal.signal); \
+       wl_list_init(&signal.l1.link); \
+       wl_list_init(&signal.l2.link); \
+       wl_list_init(&signal.l3.link);
+#define CHECK_EMIT(expected) \
+       signal.count = 0; \
+       wl_signal_emit_safe(&signal.signal, &signal); \
+       assert(signal.count == expected);
+
+TEST(signal_remove_listener)
+{
+       test_set_timeout(4);
+
+       struct signal signal;
+
+       signal.l1.notify = notify_remove;
+       signal.l2.notify = notify_remove;
+       signal.l3.notify = notify_remove;
+
+       INIT
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l1);
+
+       signal.current = &signal.l1;
+       CHECK_EMIT(1)
+       CHECK_EMIT(0)
+
+       INIT
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l1);
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l2);
+
+       CHECK_EMIT(2)
+       CHECK_EMIT(1)
+
+       INIT
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l1);
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l2);
+
+       signal.current = &signal.l2;
+       CHECK_EMIT(1)
+       CHECK_EMIT(1)
+
+       INIT
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l1);
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l2);
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l3);
+
+       signal.current = &signal.l1;
+       CHECK_EMIT(3)
+       CHECK_EMIT(2)
+
+       INIT
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l1);
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l2);
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l3);
+
+       signal.current = &signal.l2;
+       CHECK_EMIT(2)
+       CHECK_EMIT(2)
+
+       INIT
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l1);
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l2);
+       wl_signal_add(&signal.signal, &signal.l3);
+
+       signal.current = &signal.l3;
+       CHECK_EMIT(2)
+       CHECK_EMIT(2)
+}
-- 
2.18.0


_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel

Reply via email to