On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 16:20:41 +0100 Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote:
> Hi Pekka, > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 09:12, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On another matter, I've been wondering if storing the debug scopes in > > weston_compositor is a good thing. We have the logger initialized > > earlier, and quite a lot might happen before weston_compositor is > > created. Also the idea of a circular buffer for after-the-fact > > reporting might benefit from having debug scopes set up early, and the > > command line argument to enable debug scopes from launch. > > Yeah, I think we can definitely rework this to push the scope of the > debug stuff up. As noted in > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/issues/133 I think it > would be really good to have all this information as early as > possible, and maybe even outliving the compositor. From a libweston > API point of view, having the same API for general logging as we do > for debug makes a huge amount of sense. > > Given how invasive that would be, my suggestion would be that we track > that as a follow-up issue. Once we've got all the functionality in > place we can see for sure what the best API/structure would be. Agreed. Thanks, pq
pgpAW3r4ye1Z6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
