On 2019-03-07 1:43 p.m., Kai-Uwe wrote: > Am 07.03.19 um 11:15 schrieb Michel Dänzer: >> On 2019-03-07 8:05 a.m., Chris Murphy wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:02 PM Graeme Gill <grae...@argyllcms.com> wrote: >>>> [ And why should Linux/Wayland be crippled compared to >>>> every other system ? I can and do do things like fire up >>>> a test patch display using ArgyllCMS/dispwin in one corner of my >>>> screen while running ArgyllCMS/spotread in another window to >>>> measure the patches. There's no reason not to, and every reason >>>> to be able to. ] >>> Of course. It can take 5-30 minutes to do a calibration and >>> characterization. In particular if I have 2, 3 or even 4 displays >>> connected I'd want to calibrate them in sequence while the others are >>> being used for useful tasks. >> It sounds like KMS leases could be a pretty good fit for a calibration >> application. It can lease each output individually from the Wayland >> compositor and fully control it using KMS APIs, while the Wayland >> compositor continues running normally on other outputs. > > I am afraid, this concept reads quite exotic for me non kernel > developer. Would you mind elaborating on that feature without some > example code or reference on how to write such and how it integrates in > a DE.
I'll leave that to others who know more about KMS leases. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | https://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
