On Wednesday, November 13, 2019 11:11 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> However, my fear with adding such information is that then clients > might start adding conditional code paths based on the Wayland > compositor name or version, which is an incorrect approach. Client > behaviour that depends on the particular compositor must be keyed by > the available global Wayland interfaces and their versions, not by the > compositor identity. > > OTOH, Wayland is a few years old by now and developers should have > learnt better, so maybe that fear is no longer relevant. I share this fear as well. IMHO `ps` is good enough. You could also use something like `lsof /dev/dri/card0` to get the DRM master. _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
