On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:37:51 -0400 Lonnie Cumberland <lon...@outstep.com> wrote:
> One more quick question. > > I had read somewhere that Wayland has troubles with Nvidia cards, but what > is strange is that I was able to download a Wayland Linux ISO called > "WayfireWM 3D" > > https://forum.manjaro.org/t/wayfire-linux-manjaro-spin-with-wayfirewm-3d-wayland-compositer/110398 > > and iso from Sourceforge > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/wayfire-linux/ > > I actually tested it in a VirtualBox VM on a newly installed Ubuntu 20.04 > (64-bit) system that I have here to work with for getting started and it > seemed to boot up and run just fine. What is strange is that I would not > expect that my VirtualBox VM would have any real GPU acceleration in place > so that it seems perhaps that Wayland will also work on some older machines > that do not have GPU acceleration. > > Is this correct, or am I missing something important here? Hi, Wayland per se does not require any kind of graphics acceleration, OpenGL, GPU, or even a display at all. All that is supported but optional. Requirements arise from actual Wayland implementations: compositors (servers) and clients (toolkits, applications). Weston for example comes with two renderers: OpenGL and Pixman. Pixman-renderer is purely software on CPU and does not really support running hardware accelerated clients. GL-renderer uses OpenGL, which is usually provided by Mesa. Mesa's OpenGL can be hardware accelerated with supported hardware, or otherwise it will fall back to software GL. In other words, you can run OpenGL applications even on Weston/Pixman, but the OpenGL will be software-rendered. If you know you will not be having a GPU, then Weston is best ran with Pixman renderer. Using Pixman is lighter that using software GL. As an example of Wayland not needing even a display, Weston has the headless backend (as opposed to the DRM-backend that uses KMS for display). You can run Weston/headless/pixman or Weston/headless/GL without an actual display. Weston project uses that mode in its automated test suite to avoid touching or requiring actual hardware. Other Wayland compositors have different requirements. You have to study each to know what they are, being Wayland does not tell you anything. I think Linux has DRM drivers for VirtualBox providing at least KMS. GPU acceleration support is a different matter, and like I said, Mesa does automatically do (direct-rendered) software OpenGL if hardware is not available. The Nvidia story is all about the implementation details. Nvidia does not implement the same APIs that Mesa implements, which means that a Wayland compositor must be written specifically to support Nvidia proprietary drivers. Weston does not do that. GNOME's Mutter does. The Nvidia story has less to do with Wayland than it has to do with not having X11 and Xorg in the picture. Thanks, pq
pgpW4AuuWwh84.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
