On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 15:24:24 +0200 Jan Bruns <c...@abnuto.de> wrote: > Simon Ser:
... > > I don't know if it's just me, but your e-mails sound like rants and > > aren't making it very appealing for people to reply to. I think Pekka > > is being very patient and helpful here, and I'd appreciate if you could > > phrase your emails slightly differently. It's completely normal to > > not understand everything when you're getting to know something new. > > Thanks. > > No need to count users with such impression, given such impressions can > be driven by incorrect assumptions. > > For example, it's in no way my job to make an wl-talking app given a > contraint about programming language to use. > > I just do not have much preference about wether or not to include > wl-support in future apps I probably won't write. > > Isn't a collection of common pitfalls exactly what people working on > making wl better need? It's always difficult to identify why other > people's workflow is diffrent from your own. > > What I can tell about wl now is that I haven't yet identified lines of > text or code about it, that might probably be of not so much relevance, > given specific sets of workflows. That's bad news to me, a > disappointment, because making things easier for the distant future was > my only motivation for focussing on wl a bit. Sorry, but I do not understand what you are talking about. If your goal is not to write a program that uses Wayland in your preferred language, then what is it? What workflow are you referring to? If someone had the time, our email discussion would be a good indication for what to improve in the Wayland documentation. Thanks, pq
pgpYeDHv1HnOZ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
