On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 07:51:26AM +0000, Simon Ser wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday, November 6, 2020 3:14 AM, zou lan <nancy.lan....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Simon & pekka > > > > Thank you for your reply! > > > > >>The OS could pre-empt the client after > > >>the first wl_surface_commit is flushed on the wire and before the > > >>second one is. > > > > I want to ask if after first wl_surface_commit, but I don't call > > wl_display_flush/wl_display_dispatch, is the first wl_surface_commit > > flushed to server because out buffer of the connection is full? > > That is correct. > > > https://github.com/wayland-project/wayland/blob/master/src/connection.c, > > can we increase the buffer size in this structure wl_buffer to reduce > > the possibility of this? > > I'd rather not. This would not fix the issue, and it's unclear if it'd > really help. > > > By the way, for the WIP protocol, > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/jadahl/wayland-protocols/-/blob/wip/transactions/unstable/transactions/transactions-unstable-v1.xml, > > do we have any patchset in weston to implement it? I don't find it in > > weston master branch. > > I'm not aware of any Weston implementation as of yet. As you can see, > the protocol hasn't yet been merged in wayland-protocols. Writing a new > implementation would certainly help getting the protocol merged.
weston, mutter and gtk implementations are linked to from this comment: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/26#note_554405 Jonas > _______________________________________________ > wayland-devel mailing list > wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
