> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Ser <cont...@emersion.fr>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 11:47 AM
> To: Shankar, Uma <uma.shan...@intel.com>
> Cc: Alex Hung <alex.h...@amd.com>; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org; amd-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; wayland-
> de...@lists.freedesktop.org; harry.wentl...@amd.com; leo....@amd.com;
> ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com; pekka.paala...@collabora.com;
> m...@igalia.com; jad...@redhat.com; sebastian.w...@redhat.com;
> shashank.sha...@amd.com; ago...@nvidia.com; jos...@froggi.es;
> mdaen...@redhat.com; aleix...@kde.org; xaver.h...@gmail.com;
> victo...@system76.com; dan...@ffwll.ch; quic_nas...@quicinc.com;
> quic_cbr...@quicinc.com; quic_abhin...@quicinc.com; mar...@marcan.st;
> liviu.du...@arm.com; sashamcint...@google.com; Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
> <chaitanya.kumar.bo...@intel.com>; louis.chau...@bootlin.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V8 32/43] drm/colorop: Add 1D Curve Custom LUT type
> 
> On Tuesday, April 15th, 2025 at 08:09, Shankar, Uma <uma.shan...@intel.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > We want to have just one change in the way we expose the hardware
> > capabilities else all looks good in general.
> 
> I would really recommend leaving this as a follow-up extension. It's a 
> complicated
> addition that requires more discussion.

Hi Simon,
We have tried to solve the complex part and made it simple to understand and 
implement
along with a reference implementation [1] (can also help add the same for AMD 
case as well).
Without this we will end up with up 2 interfaces for 1dL Lut which is not nice 
where the one above
will be able to cover the current one. Let us know the problems with the 
proposed interface and we can
work to fix the same. But having a common and single interface is good and the 
current one will not fit
Intel's color pipeline distribution so the generic one anyways will be needed, 
and it will benefit userspace
to know the underlying LUT distribution to compute the LUT samples.

[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/129812/

Regards,
Uma Shankar

Reply via email to