On Sun, 18 May 2025 17:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Pete <sen...@5ymail.net> wrote:
> Dear Wayland protocol developers, please improve Wayland's privacy > and security model against recent screenshot and similar attacks. Hi, what attacks are you referring to? > Use > a screenshot and recording security model where applications by > default can only get pixels from themselves This is already the case in Wayland. Which is not to say anything about interfaces elsewhere. > Same for sound for both input and output including but not limited to > operating system sounds/noises. Audio is not in Wayland's scope. There are no audio interfaces in Wayland. > Security and privacy settings must also have a place that's a list of > installed application where for each application a security and > privacy oversight can be opened. Any kind of settings are out of Wayland's scope. User interface design is out of scope. > Also no autorun of insertable media by default. Out of scope. Wayland has nothing to do with that. Thanks, pq
pgpNl76p5kCvN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
