I may be in the minority here but I will take a chance on this.  I feel the
Cosby show does not not rate on the same level as Andy Griffith.  This show
portrayed elitism and not a little bit of arrogance.

Little House on the Prairie & the Waltons, I do not wish to offend anyone
and I hope you will understand my premise, were a little to syrupy and not
based in reality. I viewed them as a romantic notion of what we would like
to have imagined life  to be but was not.

Andy Griffith was realistic, no arrogance, no elitism, no portrayal of any
superiority, no syrupy deviating from reality.

I think we have seen one of a kind in television  history.

I feel that there is nothing yet I have seen that can compare.  I am
personally a big Sienfeld fan but in no way do I compare this show on any
level to  the honesty of Andy Griffith.  I also loved the Cosby show but
felt it was not realistic.

I am not a big Kenny Rogers fan in regard to his voice however I have great
respect for his humility.  On  a Larry King  interview he stated  that he
was not a star.  There were very few stars in a life time.  He equated
Elvis to be  star and further stated that there is not an Elvis in every
life time  He them mentioned Marilyn Monroe and Clark Gable. He stated also
that other entertainers, if they were lucky could stay on top for 3 years
and then try to keep their name alive.

I feel Andy Griffith is in this not always in a life time star category.

I appreciate everyone's opinions and I hope you accept mine in the same
manner.
Respectfully
Dolly




_______________________________________________
WBMUTBB mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wbmutbb.com/mailman/listinfo/wbmutbb_wbmutbb.com
http://www.mayberry.com/tagsrwc/wbmutbb/



Reply via email to