Hi All, I have a question. All this talk and uproar about the statue makes me wonder. What happened to cause it all? I believe that from the start, Karen Knotts, I would assume the executer of the estate, was in full agreement of the statue and said it was a great way to honor him. What happened to change all that? The rights of the character Barney Fife belong to Viacom like the other TAGS rights and CBS doesn't own them anymore than the Knotts estate. I guess what I don't understand the most is the problem with the statue in honor of his greatness. Does anyone have the complete details of this or any answers. Does Jim Clark have an opinion? How about you Allan, whats your opinion? I think it's a great idea and always will be. BTW, what was the talk of the Griffith associates and the lack of interest there? Any help and any answers would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks Michael Oliver Material Handler Asheville, NC (828) 651-4277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ WBMUTBB mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wbmutbb.com/mailman/listinfo/wbmutbb_wbmutbb.com http://www.mayberry.com/tagsrwc/wbmutbb/
