> On May 11, 2020, at 2:02 PM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree that the proposed SRFI is an excellent idea, especially with the > additional macros to go from lists/vectors to multiple values. Indeed, given > such a SRFI, I question whether SRFI 195 actually adds anything. It seems > simpler just to continue to restrict boxes to hold a single object which can > be converted to and from multiple values.
+1 Marc
