Am Do., 8. Mai 2025 um 17:01 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe < [email protected]>:
> I like this proposal very much. Thanks to ufo for writing it. > > Perhaps the SRFI should recommend that Scheme implementations > that support both SRFI 97 and SRFI 261 treat (srfi :N foo) and > (srfi srfi-N foo) as names for the same library? > If that means that loading (srfi :N id...) implicitly loads a virtual library (srfi srfi-N id...) that has the same bindings (and vice versa), I think such a recommendation is compatible with R6RS. I am not sure, though, whether I think it is a good one because when SRFI 261 is accepted, the SRFI 97-file should become deprecated and implementation should not necessarily carry old baggage with them. However, I support a recommendation that (srfi N id ...) and (srfi srfi-N ...) where the first N is numeric are treated the same when implementations support numeric library parts. Marc
