To add to Rudy's comments about JavaScript: 1. It is useful for performing some tasks, where a server-side solution is not available, such as for browser sniffing. But, if you can do this server-side, you will send less code to the client browser.
2. CSS has a set of standards that are followed - eventually - by the browsers. As people have said before here, CSS degrades fairly neatly, so there shouldn't be problems with older or non-conformant browsers. JavaScript can become complex if it is to degrade neatly. (And there is always 'noscript' to consider.) Although there are established specs for JavaScript, there does not seem to be a common implementation. Even Navigator has adopted the appalling 'innerHTML' and its horrid Gorgon sisters from 'JScript'; this effect can be done better in other ways, some of which already existed when it was invented. Regards, David ____ � The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM � ____ To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To change subscription settings to the wdvltalk digest version: http://wdvl.internet.com/WDVL/Forum/#sub ________________ http://www.wdvl.com _______________________ You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
