> Well I ran wired.com through the validator and found 3 "errors" when I went
> to the lines where the errors appeared on line 206. All 3 reported errors
> were from that line refer to one link. Something that could easily be fixed.
I've noticed that many "big name" web sites don't get anywhere close
to validating. My theory is that this can be blamed on various content
management systems. Either software is being used by non-tech types to
fill in templates or psuedo-xml style file conversions are providing
more or less HTML coded pages. You would think that the bigger the
budget, the more likely they'd be to spend the time and concern on
quality web pages. But I know, that spending all my time with making
web pages, I'm a bit biased. :)
~ Nathan Lyle (The U.P. Web Maestro)
Web: www.upwebmaestro.com E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (906)485-4806
"Computers do not solve problems, they execute solutions." - Laurent Gasser.
____ � The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM � ____
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change subscription settings to the wdvltalk digest version:
http://wdvl.internet.com/WDVL/Forum/#sub
________________ http://www.wdvl.com _______________________
You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
