CSS 3 is in the formation stage, under development. You don't need to worry
about it right now but if there is something you'd like to see added or
changed now is the time to join the W3C working group and try to get it in
the next version. ;-)

I'm going to take this back onto the main list, as I'd like to raise an issue that is starting to bother me. My question was whether anyone else apart from Mozilla has started to implement parts of the current CSS3 specs. My concern is that if Mozilla implements properties that are eventually different from the final specs for CSS3, or are not even in those specs, will we find ourselves back in the bad old days of 'blink' and 'marquee'? Some of Mozilla's current CSS3 work is different from the current specs as it is.


I know that the CSS3 implemented in Firefox is 'unannounced' and for Mozilla's own testing, but we do have a habit of using these things if we know about them. I've been experimenting with rounded corners on borders myself.

But are we going to end up with CSS full of properties starting with '-moz-' or '-opera-' or '-ie-'? Might these finish up with version numbers or platform names in them, like the bad old days when IE5.5 Win differed in behaviours from IE5.5 Mac?

Regards,
David


____ � The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM � ____
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To set a personal password send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words: "set WDVLTALK pw=yourpassword" in the body of the email.
To change subscription settings to the wdvltalk digest version:
http://wdvl.internet.com/WDVL/Forum/#sub


________________  http://www.wdvl.com  _______________________

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.



Reply via email to