Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 11:39:34AM -0800, Kathy E. Gill wrote:
> > OH - and the folks who rate performance of network servers have announced
> > that they will add linux to their next report -- since NT is always at the
> > bottom (6th of 6 systems) -- this should be interesting. IBM-unix 'won' the
> > last time.
>
> Then their metrics are all wrong. IBM's AIX is the *worst* Unix implementation
> I have seen in 19 years of working full-time with Unix. Only people who
> always buy IBM because they always *did* buy IBM seem to want to acquire it:
> anybody who has a choice runs away screaming.
well, IBM has the advantage of building the hardware, too. Not
surprising to me it "won" if I assume that it was running on a 100% IBM
RS/6000 with nothing but IBM parts and software. Gives them a bit of an
advantage. ;)
As a user-friendly OS, I'd rank it one step above NT, which is one step
above entering commands directly into machine language by hand in my
book :P
B
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The NEW Web Consultants Association FORUMS and CHAT:
Register Today at: http://just4u.com/forums/
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
Give the Gift of Life This Year...
Just4U Stop Smoking Support forum - helping smokers for
over three years-tell a friend: http://just4u.com/forums/
To get 500 Banner Ads for FREE
go to http://www.linkbuddies.com/start.go?id=111261
---------------------------------------------------------------------
